Global Tech Is Falling — But the Space Sector (in China) Is Selling Off in Three Very Different Ways, Pointing to Three Very Different Endgames

July’s selloff is not just a China commercial space story. But even within the same downturn, SpaceX, Changyingtong, and China Satcom are each falling for very different reasons.

Understanding those differences is the key to knowing what can recover and what may not.

On July 10, the successful sea recovery of the Long March 10B drove a surge in China’s A-share commercial space sector, with more than 30 stocks hitting limit-up. Just three days later, the sector dropped 6.82% in one day, with 103 stocks down more than 10%. From its year-to-date high of 2,444 points to 1,551 on July 21, the sector lost 36.5%.

At the same time, space-related assets in the U.S. also came under pressure. SpaceX fell from 225 to 119, below its IPO price of 135. The ARKX Space ETF dropped from 37.89 in May to 30.95 on July 22. Viasat pulled back from 93 to 74, down 20% in July alone.

But these declines are not the same. They reflect three very different layers of valuation compression.

1. Narrative reset

SpaceX fell 47%, from 225 to 119. This was not a collapse in fundamentals. Starlink already has meaningful revenue, profit, and scale. The problem is that SpaceX was never valued only on current business performance.

A large part of its valuation came from long-duration upside: Starship, Mars, orbital infrastructure, and future AI-related space services. When long-term U.S. Treasury yields stay above 5%, those far-out cash flows are worth much less today.

This is not just a space story. It is what happens when higher rates compress the premium investors are willing to pay for ambitious future narratives.

2. Concept collapse

Changyingtong (688143) fell 43%. Juli Sling (002342) fell 33%. Their issue is not that they became too expensive. It is that the market eventually realized their actual exposure to aerospace was minimal.

Changyingtong has stated that revenue from the relevant aerospace-related fiber product is less than 1% of total revenue. Juli Sling denied multiple market rumors and disclosed aerospace-related revenue of less than 0.30%.

This is what happens when a thematic rally prices in assets that were never truly there. In a rising market, labels can be enough. In a correction, the market starts asking for substance.

3. Liquidity and expectation reset

This is the most subtle case.

China Satcom is a real satellite infrastructure asset. Its business is stable, its cash flow is visible, and its role in satellite communications is genuine. Yet its stock has fallen sharply, while Viasat—another satellite communications operator—has held up much better this year.

The difference is not simply operations. It is expectations.

China Satcom had been priced as if future constellation buildout would give it a near-exclusive gateway position in China’s satellite communications ecosystem. But if that future turns out to be more open—shared across major telecom operators rather than controlled by a single gatekeeper—then that premium has to come down.

So unlike false concept names, China Satcom is not a fake asset. It is a real asset undergoing a valuation reset.

Conclusion

The space selloff is not one trade unwinding in one way.

It is at least three different corrections happening at once:

• Narrative reset: when rates compress dream valuations

• Concept collapse: when weak or irrelevant exposure gets exposed

• Liquidity and expectation reset: when real assets are repriced around a more realistic future

All three can fall by 30–50%. But their paths afterward will be very different.

That is the real signal beneath the drawdown.

LU FRONTIER STRATEGIES

© 2026 LU Frontier Strategies. All rights reserved.